Bolt, the latest animated feature from Walt Disney Animation Studios, hits theatre screens across North America tomorrow.Not being a Pixar production, the choice not to cover the film every step of the way was easy to make. Still, Bolt does boast strong connections to ‘Emeryville’. In his ex officio role as chief creative officer of WDAS, Pixar creative chief John Lasseter was exceptionally engaged in his role as executive producer of the film, guiding the production (including talented directors Chris Williams and Byron Howard) right from the start —a first since the Disney-Pixar merger.
Bolt marks the first time in nearly two years that WDAS has put out a picture. Having seen the film, Bolt more importantly appears to mark the beginning of the revitalization of Walt Disney Animation.
Bolt (left) with Mittens and Rhino
History

'American Dog' concept art
Cast
Production
Directors Chris Williams (left) and Byron Howard
- The animation team was given only a year and a half to complete the movie, much less than the usual for a CG animated picture.
- One of the biggest animation challenges was Rhino, due to the problems presented by the translucency of his hamster ball. Says supervising animator Clay Kaytis: "Every shot required calculating which way the ball would move if he shifted his weight."
- The film's backgrounds feature an original, unique hand-painted look. This was acheived using new technology developed and patented by Disney.
Presentation
In addition to its traditional presentation in regular theatres, Bolt is also being screened in stereoscopic Disney Digital 3-D (Disney’s branding of Real D Cinema) in selected theatres equipped for 3-D digital projection.
Unlike Disney's previous movies released in digital 3-D —Chicken Little and Meet the Robinsons— which were converted into the format by an outside company (ILM) using a post-production process, Bolt is Disney’s first feature to be made with 3-D specifically in mind, all 3-D effects being created in-house.
"As a result", says producer Clark Spencer, "we can actually influence the storytelling through the 3-D process in terms of what’s happening emotionally in the film. Rather than over-using the technique, we’re able to do something much more subtle and satisfying to the audience."
My Review
Let’s me start this way: I liked Bolt. It’s an enjoyable movie and it’s definitely better than anything from Walt Disney Animation in about the last decade. The story and characters are entertaining, the character design is very well done (very Pixaresque), and, to my surprise, the voice acting really fit. An hour and a half well spent. That said, I did have a couple of problems with the movie that I want to discuss here.
My main problem with Bolt is that the last animated picture I saw in the theatre was Pixar's WALL-E. WALL-E is one tough act to follow. Possibly because of this, at least in part, Bolt's storyline seemed too simple and un-complex, at least for my taste, and predictable at times. No philosophical overtones like in WALL-E or Toy Story.
Another issue is Bolt himself (the dog). Even though he’s supposed to be the main character, he doesn’t drive the story at all. After the really moving opening scene where he's adopted from the puppy shelter by Penny, nearly everything else in the movie overpowers his role. For instance, Rhino is the real (hilarious) star of the show, right from the moment he appears on screen —to great benefit.
In the end, though, my biggest issue with the movie isn't really about the movie. I tend to believe that WDAS should focus on traditional animation, rather than the 3D, computer generated variety pioneered by Pixar. Makes sense: Two feature animation studios at Disney; one focusing on the traditional form of the art, the other on computer animation. Bolt would certainly have been just as good if traditionally animated. And that would certainly help ease the confusion that now exists. (I’ve read in no less than half-a-dozen places Bolt described as being from Pixar.)
Putting it simply, there's a lot of good things about Bolt, but also some room for improvement. As I wrote: "Bolt ...appears to mark the beginning of the revitalization of Walt Disney Animation." That's exactly it.
Your thoughts?

17 comments:
It's almost 1:00 Central Time, you know. :)
Nevermind, it's released on the 21st, not the 20th... LOL...
cool. did you see it last night, (Wednesday), then?
wow... where'd you get all that info from... you must have been working on that article for a while!
Bolt being compared to Pixar, is a clarification issue. It does not mean that because of this confusion, Disney shouldn't make 3-D animated films on their own since Pixar's making them.
Personally, I think that Bolt worked in 3-D, and probably would not have worked as well in 2-D. The story fit the medium it was in. Pixar is Pixar, and Disney is Disney. Just because Disney owns Pixar, (a studio devoted to 3-D), doesn't mean that they can't make their own films with that technology. Because, in the end, both studio's make movies with a different feel, and I like to see what each will do. It's more interesting that way.
if PIXAR wanted to make a 2-D animated movie... what would you think???
They could!
then what's wrong with Disney doing 3-D???
I agree, straight Disney movies are hard to see without a skeptical eye, but they can catch you off guard. Consider this a rest stop on the way to the next pure Pixar release.
Great piece Mike. It's more information on Bolt than I thought I would want to read, but it's packaged very well and has a good length and you make it interesting.
Pixar is way, way better at it, that's what...
Hey there! Still an avid reader. I was wondering, since I've enjoyed your reviews and all of us here have opinions on the animated fare, which do you think was the best non-Pixar film: Horton Hears a Who, Kung Fu Panda, Madagascar 2 (!), or Bolt?
~Sarah
Whoops, "Igor" must've slipped my mind. (pffft!)
The only one I've actually seen is Bolt, so I'll say Bolt!
I bet I enjoyed it more than I would have any of the other movies...
Interesting...
All the beautifully animated movies are thought of as a Pixar child. I think it's kind of flattering. But you know what I think (and probably ya'll will agree) is that Disney tries to get themselves and Pixar mixed up ON PURPOSE so they can try and take some of the praise (even though it's no rightly theirs.)I'm not saying Disney's bad, but I think they need to step of their high horse---which is very high since it's a multi-million dollar company--- and try and set people straight. It's like Coraline, (sorry for going off topic)Henry Selick made the movie but everyone says it's Tim Burton's movie.
P.S. Tim Burton supposedly did Nihtmare Before Xmas but all he really did was help write the story!Coraline and Nightmare were by the same company.
I liked the movie, the animation was good, as well as the voice acting. Even so I was dissappointed in parts the film's storyline. It was a typical movie that I would expect from Disney (exept when I figured out that "Bolt" didn't really have his said "superpowers") but still what my point is, is that when I was watching it, the last 20-25 minutes of the movie were just utterly terrible and completely uninteresting ,However, It was not as enlightening as the past scenes in the movie.
This is my opinion only, and some people may think differently and I support that.
:) <3 <3 <3 5 stars to "Bolt!" <3 <3 <3
Personally, I'm glad that Disney decided to do Bolt instead of American Dog. The plot for American Dog just seemed really weird, in my opinion. (I read the plot on Wikipedia.) Don't get me wrong, I love it when people come up with new, unusual stories, but the story of American Dog was just plain (in the words of the pigeon in Bolt) "ridonculous!"
Bolt is definitely for the young and the young at heart.
I just watched this movie last night :D , cool animation, great!
Post a Comment